View Full Version : Objective Definition of "Good" and "Bad"
WhiffleBallTony
02-14-2009, 05:14 PM
So, I know that just about everyone here (including me) thinks of the words "good" and "bad" (in terms of music) are very subjective and hold no factual weight.
However, I've been thinking about if there actually can be a true factual definition of the words. After thinking about this, I came up with something that I believe in.
I think good should be defined as how well an artist/band is able to get the sound that they envision.
Basically, if an album ends up being exactly how a given band envisioned it in their mind, then it's amazing. But if Katy Perry wants to make a catchy, chart-topping single, but it ends up coming out as an erratic progressive death metal song, then it is absolutely horrible.
The thing about this is that the only way to truly judge music with this definition is if you are actually the artist, which of course we aren't. However, I think it's actually a good definition. What do you guys think?
Alright_Computer
02-14-2009, 05:18 PM
Well, I could create a song similar to brokencyde's Freaxxx and intend it to be a catchy, chart-topping single. By that definition, it would be good. However, I'd still think it would be horrible (and hopefully everyone else would too).
I don't think good and bad have objective definitions. It's really just up to the listener to decide which one it is.
afterstasis
02-14-2009, 05:37 PM
i can't agree with that definition, partially because i feel many truly great musical moments are quite accidental (or at the very least unplanned).
MronoC
02-14-2009, 05:43 PM
Good is what is expected and acceptable to society as a whole. Bad the characteristic of being something other than what is accpeted by society as a whole.
In short good = boring, bad = interesting :D
WhiffleBallTony
02-14-2009, 07:30 PM
i can't agree with that definition, partially because i feel many truly great musical moments are quite accidental (or at the very least unplanned).
I can feel this. Maybe a more accurate description would be how well the artists feel about their finished product?
Good is what is expected and acceptable to society as a whole. Bad the characteristic of being something other than what is accpeted by society as a whole.
In short good = boring, bad = interesting :D
That's a pretty close-minded opinion.
Hungryfreak
02-14-2009, 07:32 PM
I still think it's subjective. Your definition in itself relies on the subjective opinion of the bands in question.
afterstasis
02-14-2009, 07:32 PM
I can feel this. Maybe a more accurate description would be how well the artists feel about their finished product?
even then there are loads of examples where i strongly disagree, particularly after some artists grow old and think their older (and far superior) material is weak and/or amateur.
instantdeath999
02-14-2009, 07:35 PM
I think it's impossible to give a clear cut definition of "bad music", to be honest.
afterstasis
02-14-2009, 07:38 PM
I think it's impossible to give a clear cut definition of "bad music", to be honest.
yep... as convenient as it would ultimately be, it's totally impossible.
MronoC
02-14-2009, 07:39 PM
I can feel this. Maybe a more accurate description would be how well the artists feel about their finished product?
That's a pretty close-minded opinion.
Something can still be good if the creator of it ends up dismissing it, Rivers Cuomo spoke ill of Pinkerton shortly after its release, but that doesn't make it a bad album, and, for a non-musical example, Wes Craven seems to be doing everything in his power to escape from his older work, but that doesn't mean that the remake of Last House on the Left won't suck compared to the original.
Also, my first post was partly a joke, and partly a way of saying that any non-subjective definition of good or bad would be totally contradictory to anyone with a mind of their own.
WingsOfSteel
02-14-2009, 10:02 PM
Good - A band I like
Bad - A band I don't like
The Worst S***-Suckers to Ever Pick Up Instruments - A band you like that I don't.
Lolicat
02-14-2009, 11:13 PM
Good and bad are the singular most annoying words in the English language, using them should be a crime. We use an amazingly rich and complex language, and people stick to the safe carmel centre when the nougat and hazelnut around that is far superior, and the chocolate outside the very best.
I think one should choose a word or phrase that describes how they really feel about a band. I mean it's all very easy to call brokeNCYDE (my pet 'bad band' I think) simply 'bad', but why not take it up a notch, call them a symptom of the myspace generation, a product of inanity and the F5 key, coupled with a total lack of education moral, poetic or musical. I think it's hard to contest these points, even if you do enjoy the band.
MronoC
02-14-2009, 11:20 PM
Good and bad are the singular most annoying words in the English language, using them should be a crime. We use an amazingly rich and complex language, and people stick to the safe carmel centre when the nougat and hazelnut around that is far superior, and the chocolate outside the very best.
I think one should choose a word or phrase that describes how they really feel about a band. I mean it's all very easy to call brokeNCYDE (my pet 'bad band' I think) simply 'bad', but why not take it up a notch, call them a symptom of the myspace generation, a product of inanity and the F5 key, coupled with a total lack of education moral, poetic or musical. I think it's hard to contest these points, even if you do enjoy the band.
Trapped inside a lexicological candy bar... that is the best metaphor ever.
Lolicat
02-14-2009, 11:23 PM
Trapped inside a lexicological candy bar... that is the best metaphor ever.
I think it held up quite well, and although I wish I had made it a more exotic chocolate bar.
Hungryfreak
02-14-2009, 11:23 PM
I always thought the most annoying word was 'like'. Come on, people! It's not a gosh derned comma!
MronoC
02-14-2009, 11:25 PM
I always thought the most annoying word was 'like'. Come on, people! It's not a gosh derned comma!
it's basically the equivalent of "uhh", "umm", "erm", etc.
edit: that said, I'm totally guilty of using it frequently
Lolicat
02-14-2009, 11:46 PM
I always thought the most annoying word was 'like'. Come on, people! It's not a gosh derned comma!
I enjoy using it in conversation, it makes me feel giggly and inane, I don't like being a total pretentious English student all the time. My last essay came with a note saying I had an 'idiosyncratic' way of citing texts though, because I always tart them up. I think it was when I said critics 'danced merrily around' some point or another that annoyed my tutor.
WhiffleBallTony
02-14-2009, 11:51 PM
I always thought the most annoying word was 'like'. Come on, people! It's not a gosh derned comma!
I must admit that I, like, sometimes do that.
Lolicat
02-14-2009, 11:56 PM
I must admit that I, like, sometimes do that.
Like, o my God, like, me too, like!
MronoC
02-15-2009, 12:00 AM
I mean it's, like, if you were to stop talking, the pause would be, like, awkward, but you don't want to just, like, murmur and stuff like that.
Hungryfreak
02-15-2009, 12:15 AM
It gets annoying when everyone says it around 10-15 times per sentence. I've counted and got numbers like that.
MronoC
02-15-2009, 12:28 AM
It gets annoying when everyone says it around 10-15 times per sentence. I've counted and got numbers like that.
were they run-on sentences?
Hungryfreak
02-15-2009, 12:41 AM
Some yes, some no.
instantdeath999
02-15-2009, 12:42 AM
I am guilty of misusing "like" on occasion, but others my age make my problem nearly non-existent.
Lolicat
02-15-2009, 12:45 AM
I adore slang English. I don't like traditional colloquialisms unless they're ironic, and detest internet slang, but other than that, slang is something I adore.
Hungryfreak
02-15-2009, 12:58 AM
I love old slang that no one uses anymore, primarily because no one uses it, haha. My language in the real world tends to be an odd mix of old slang, ye olde English, eloquent language, weird intentional mispronunciations, French and purposeful misuse of words.
instantdeath999
02-15-2009, 01:01 AM
I love old slang that no one uses anymore, primarily because no one uses it, haha. My language in the real world tends to be an odd mix of old slang, ye olde English, eloquent language, weird intentional mispronunciations, French and purposeful misuse of words.
I actually read a couple of the first issues of Spiderman a little while ago... it was like a different language :eek:
Lolicat
02-15-2009, 01:04 AM
I love old slang that no one uses anymore, primarily because no one uses it, haha. My language in the real world tends to be an odd mix of old slang, ye olde English, eloquent language, weird intentional mispronunciations, French and purposeful misuse of words.
I dump some German and Latin into my speech, and try to juxtapose the grosteque and vulgar with eloquent language. Hence, I'll try to describe as poetically as possible some sick crime, and then swear like a sailor talking about something cutesy.
Hungryfreak
02-15-2009, 01:07 AM
I actually read a couple of the first issues of Spiderman a little while ago... it was like a different language :eek:
Gee whillikers, I do quite enjoy being hip with yon lingo, si tu sais que je dis.
Alright_Computer
02-15-2009, 02:35 AM
I liek, liek, use, liek, the word, "liek", liek, too many, liek, times.
Intentional misspellings FTW!
Lolicat
02-15-2009, 03:30 AM
I liek, liek, use, liek, the word, "liek", liek, too many, liek, times.
Intentional misspellings FTW!
I haet to admit it, but I liek that too.
Alright_Computer
02-15-2009, 03:58 PM
I haet to admit it, but I liek that too.
Liek, it's liek, amazzing!
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.7 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.