Shrek Forever After: 2nd Trailer

[arniejolt]

Okay, I thought Paul McCartney would be too obvious for a voice and they must be pulling a South Park (speeding up Sir Paul's voice in order to sound different) but now I'm surprised with how it worked out.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/dor/objects/...rlr_031610.html

[bmaninc]

Shrek is one of my favorite people in the world.

[Banky71]

Was Shrek his first name or his last name?

[ultimatespidey81]

i watched the 1st shrek. thought it was good. never really got interested in any of the sequels.

[kiggidykev]

I watched both trailers and chuckled a couple times, but it feels like rehash from the plots of the other movies.

[Soja]

Despite taglines, this won't be the last film. And it's for that reason that I'm just tired of Shrek anything.

[kiggidykev]

I guess technically they can say this is the "final" one storywise if they make a prequel next.

[General Lein979]

(Skip if it was implied that that wasn't Macca.)
Paul doesn't do the main antagonist it was just a strong rumor that he would do it. They instead decided to go with the pre-voice reader because they liked what he added to the character.

There's still a possibility that he's doing a smaller part in the movie though.

[bood-boy]

i heard he starts a band in this one and grows his hair out. i wonder if theyll release the songs from the movie as DLC... if not maybe theyll get on the RBN?

[sillystou]

Meh, stop making Shrek movies already...

[bood-boy]

but but but..... you make things that make money. and shrek keeps making money. how much did shrek 3 make again?
budget: $160M ..... gross revenue: $798M. the numbers speak for themselves, regardless of quality content. thats not hollywoods dilemma anymore.

[Pwnz0r3d]

I've lost interest in Shrek since the second one, the third was rushed to ensure that people were still into the series.

I feel sorry for Dreamworks, they've only had very few good movies, and those are the ones that spawned sequels which ruined the franchises.