cmg4894
08-12-2007, 01:49 PM
I have posted this idea on Scorehero and have gotten a very negative response. I don't think the people there are getting my idea. I'm doing it here to get another opinion.
Price on RB and GHIII has been a big topic on most forums. Here is my idea:
This is the third year in a row for a GH game and another guitar. So you're looking at spending $100. I know you don't have to buy the bundle but with the wireless guitar, I am. The quality of the guitars have gotten better with each game. I think the Les Paul is going to get the best. Back on topic, instead of releasing a new game every year how about not releasing a disc and only DLC. I know it is promised but most people are thinking of it as only small add-ons.
Now on to RB. Are we going to need an RBII next year? I know this is a little soon but with the rumored price, most people are going to have to start saving money right after they get the first one. If we know we won't get an upgrade for two or three years that would save us money in the long run. Look at the difference between GH, GHII, and GHIII. GHII was the best I think. Do we really need the changes for GHIII. I know of the engine thing but come on? Most of what I have heard is "oh it looks so much better". Do you really care. It is basically 5 colored circles on a board. I could deal with a white background and stick figures. The game is still really fun. AND with people complaining about how they like this song and don't like that song it could be a solution to that too. You only buy what you want and don't have it included on a disk you have to play to beat the game.
This has gotten too long. Just wondering if it is needed to have a physical disc in hand. Look at GH: RT80's. Just a disc that is just like GHII but new songs. I don't own it but I've played it. I don't think it's worth $50. $30 as DLC would have been better. When we are on RBVII and GHX and you want to play a song on #3 then #6 you would have to change discs. With DLC everything would be on a master list.
Price on RB and GHIII has been a big topic on most forums. Here is my idea:
This is the third year in a row for a GH game and another guitar. So you're looking at spending $100. I know you don't have to buy the bundle but with the wireless guitar, I am. The quality of the guitars have gotten better with each game. I think the Les Paul is going to get the best. Back on topic, instead of releasing a new game every year how about not releasing a disc and only DLC. I know it is promised but most people are thinking of it as only small add-ons.
Now on to RB. Are we going to need an RBII next year? I know this is a little soon but with the rumored price, most people are going to have to start saving money right after they get the first one. If we know we won't get an upgrade for two or three years that would save us money in the long run. Look at the difference between GH, GHII, and GHIII. GHII was the best I think. Do we really need the changes for GHIII. I know of the engine thing but come on? Most of what I have heard is "oh it looks so much better". Do you really care. It is basically 5 colored circles on a board. I could deal with a white background and stick figures. The game is still really fun. AND with people complaining about how they like this song and don't like that song it could be a solution to that too. You only buy what you want and don't have it included on a disk you have to play to beat the game.
This has gotten too long. Just wondering if it is needed to have a physical disc in hand. Look at GH: RT80's. Just a disc that is just like GHII but new songs. I don't own it but I've played it. I don't think it's worth $50. $30 as DLC would have been better. When we are on RBVII and GHX and you want to play a song on #3 then #6 you would have to change discs. With DLC everything would be on a master list.
