RockBand.com


View Full Version : is the 360 reaching the peak of its technical capabilities??



ultimatespidey81
09-06-2008, 04:16 PM
found an interesting story with comments from a leading developer (Epic) on 360 games saying, "I think we're certainly approaching the upper end of it, as far as what developers are able to do". does make one think how long this generation of platforms will reign.

so how long till the new xbox comes out and will it have rock band exclusivity as well? lol

http://videogames.yahoo.com/feature/xbox-360-exhausted-/1244037

ps hurray for my 1st thread :D

Starfleet_Rambo
09-06-2008, 04:31 PM
We still got a few years 'til the next Xbox is out.

dgiles79
09-06-2008, 04:31 PM
They probably are reaching the limits of what the hardware can do, it's been out for almost 3 years now. But I think they can release games at the current level for the next couple of years without any real issues.

I wouldn't expect a new console for about 2 years yet.

Kariodude
09-06-2008, 04:32 PM
I don't think we are going to see any real new consoles for some time. We might get a Blu-Ray attachment for the 360 at some point, or we might get new versions of the same consoles, but as for brand new consoles with new capabilities, I just don't see it happening.

benson111
09-06-2008, 04:33 PM
They probably are reaching the limits of what the hardware can do, it's been out for almost 3 years now. But I think they can release games at the current level for the next couple of years without any real issues.

I wouldn't expect a new console for about 2 years yet.

Ditto, most consoles from now on can expect a 5 year run, Play Station excluded, since it and the dreamcast where the first of there kind.

FloodOne
09-06-2008, 04:59 PM
will you really care if we get sweet titles like gears for the next 2 years? if its any consolation, i personally think MGS4 is about as good as graphics will get for the ps3

kiggidykev
09-06-2008, 05:14 PM
Even if the 360 is reaching its peak, isn't it reassuring to know that some games (http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/destroyallhumanspathofthefuron/index.html) will continue to stagnate and not even try to push its boundaries further? :)

Kariodude
09-06-2008, 05:17 PM
i personally think MGS4 is about as good as graphics will get for the ps3

MGS4 puts out a low resolution though. It isn't even 1080p. If I remember correctly, it natively puts out 700p or around there. There are PS3 games with better graphics.

FloodOne
09-06-2008, 05:19 PM
i agree with kev

no matter what the peak is, there will be AAA titles, A titles, and the rest of the trash

EDIT- i haven't seen any ps3 games with better visuals. then again fallout 3 isnt here yet

fatalvendetta
09-06-2008, 05:27 PM
Ditto, most consoles from now on can expect a 5 year run, Play Station excluded, since it and the dreamcast where the first of there kind.

The PlayStation 2 is in its eighth year with games still being made for it. The original Xbox was only out for four years before the 360 came out and was discontinued a year later. Expect a new Xbox to be announced by E3.

----------------
Now playing: Pink Floyd - On The Run (http://www.foxytunes.com/artist/pink+floyd/track/on+the+run)
via FoxyTunes (http://www.foxytunes.com/signatunes/)

onduvalst
09-06-2008, 05:36 PM
Thats what I really hate about Microsoft, instead of making quality long term products, they shove stuff out the door. They know it will only last a couple years and they can then put out a new one and get all ya'lls money again.

Fennz
09-06-2008, 05:39 PM
Thats what I really hate about Microsoft, instead of making quality long term products, they shove stuff out the door. They know it will only last a couple years and they can then put out a new one and get all ya'lls money again.

they don't call them Micro$oft for nothing.

ultimatespidey81
09-06-2008, 05:47 PM
will you really care if we get sweet titles like gears for the next 2 years? if its any consolation, i personally think MGS4 is about as good as graphics will get for the ps3

some of the best graphics for the ps3 came via ratchet & clank game and the developers for that game said they only tapped into about 30% of the capabilities. i would find the article but am too damm lazy lol mgs4 while it looks amazing, i think a game will come out that will look even better. (resistance 2 maybe?)

Rock_Starman
09-06-2008, 05:47 PM
I think it's at it's limit for disc storage capability. 30 hour game on 2 discs? :rolleyes: :confused:

Shredder87
09-06-2008, 05:55 PM
I like to hold judgement on when they reached the limit of the system until the system itself is dead.

I mean I thought the PS2 was looking crappy early on.(Well it always did. hahaha) but God Of War, 2, and Resident Evil 4 came out to prove the system still had some jugo to be squeezed out.

Sonofmogh
09-06-2008, 07:24 PM
OP'ed by a bitter Wii owner perhaps??? Nah I'm just messing with ya'... that's an interesting claim.

benson111
09-06-2008, 08:10 PM
[QUOTE=fatalvendetta;1183644]The PlayStation 2 is in its eighth year with games still being made for it. The original Xbox was only out for four years before the 360 came out and was discontinued a year later. Expect a new Xbox to be announced by E3.

You made my point after i did.

5 years is the max for a modern console. ( microsoft )
I did say that the playstation was the exception to the rule. ( Yea there are still people making games based on PS1 tecnology ) Microsoft on the other hand decides to abandon the origional XB to force development on the 360 and have had more time to reach hardware limits. PS3 has blueray on its side this time and will continue to be developed for a long time. However dont expect microsoft to sit by and let that go for long. Either with a new console, or with an external BD to read games from. It will happen. and the 360 has the power to do it. Now if a could just talk the gang over at MS to let me use an external hard drive, now that would be great. Having a external 1 tB hard drive .....SIC.

FloodOne
09-06-2008, 09:58 PM
some of the best graphics for the ps3 came via ratchet & clank game and the developers for that game said they only tapped into about 30% of the capabilities. i would find the article but am too damm lazy lol mgs4 while it looks amazing, i think a game will come out that will look even better. (resistance 2 maybe?)

r2 will look sick, but better then MGS4? doubt it.
and hopefully MS doesn't make customers buy a BD add-on to game... that just feels like a bad business move and could potentially alienate the entire 360 community. w/o competition the gaming industry will stagnate.

GO SONY

and to a lesser extent go MS too

macdaddy3598
09-06-2008, 10:54 PM
The recent price drop suggests to me that a discontinuation is closing it. It's the usual MS tactic as I've seen with their software and peripherals... so I get that feeling.

I doubt the reason for the drop was due to slumping 360 sales because even its previous price it was still more reachable than that of the PS3.

I wonder if Gamestop will take a pre-order on the xBox 720... :D

ultimatespidey81
09-07-2008, 02:49 AM
r2 will look sick, but better then MGS4? doubt it.
and hopefully MS doesn't make customers buy a BD add-on to game... that just feels like a bad business move and could potentially alienate the entire 360 community. w/o competition the gaming industry will stagnate.

GO SONY

and to a lesser extent go MS too

god of war 3 could potentially be a better looking game that mgs4. i just cant believe that mgs4 is the peak of what the ps3 can dish out. but if a rep of Epic games is saying that the technical capabilities of the 360 'may' have peaked doesn't bode well in the long run for the shelf life of 360. 2-3 more yrs & we could get an announcement for a release of a new MS console

Aniwarp
09-07-2008, 04:02 AM
I doubt the 360 has reached "the peak" yet. The reason games get better looking as a system ages is because developers discover ways to improve code in order to basically cheat the system into doing what it is not intended to do. For instance, with the NES, which lasted for anywhere between 7 and 12 (or even 24 years) depending on who you ask, (The NES started 1983, SNES 1990, Stopped production 1995, stopped repairing 2007), at first created rather blocky games, and continued to eventually have games on par with early SNES games, (See difference between Super Mario Brothers,Super Mario Brothers 3, and Super Mario World). The 360 will continue to produce better and better looking games until its retirement (probably in 2011, imo).

Oh, and PC's are better than either. A good gaming computer has more power than either the 360 or the PS3. There is a reason Crysis isn't on a console yet... they have to redo the code so that the consoles can actually run it with their technical limitations.

:-p

leftover_crack
09-07-2008, 10:19 AM
MGS4 puts out a low resolution though. It isn't even 1080p. If I remember correctly, it natively puts out 700p or around there. There are PS3 games with better graphics.

im not trying to start a console war here but didnt halo 3 have 640p


thats not even a real resolution

FloodOne
09-07-2008, 10:56 AM
god of war 3 could potentially be a better looking game that mgs4. i just cant believe that mgs4 is the peak of what the ps3 can dish out. but if a rep of Epic games is saying that the technical capabilities of the 360 'may' have peaked doesn't bode well in the long run for the shelf life of 360. 2-3 more yrs & we could get an announcement for a release of a new MS console

well if games on the ps3 can get better looking than MGS4 im stoked. and like i said before even if the 360 has hit a "peak" i'll take two more years of games that look like gears2

Shredder87
09-07-2008, 02:42 PM
im not trying to start a console war here but didnt halo 3 have 640p


thats not even a real resolution
Nobody mentioned Halo you douche.

Shredder87
09-07-2008, 05:32 PM
A huevo!!!
My jugo was sucked out earlier. :D
That's awesome!!! You dirty little man you!!!

Starfleet_Rambo
09-07-2008, 06:18 PM
Graphics, smackics. Too much emphasis on glitz instead of gameplay.

No Xbox 720 'til 2012 plz. :mad:

ultimatespidey81
09-07-2008, 08:21 PM
Graphics, smackics. Too much emphasis on glitz instead of gameplay.

No Xbox 720 'til 2012 plz. :mad:

this is true on the graphics but i dont think MS can hold their wad for 4 yrs w/o talk of a new system. or sony & nintendo. IMO nintendo will be the 1st to announce a new system as the wii is not capable of putting out epic games like gears, mgs4 etc.

on another topic on the wii, does anybody else think the success of the wii caught nintendo by surprise? what i mean is the system has certain limitations (no hdd, graphical, console shortages etc). had they anticipated the boom in sales i imagine they would've made the wii a true 'next-gen' system instead of a gamecube w/wands. right??:confused:

Starfleet_Rambo
09-07-2008, 08:36 PM
this is true on the graphics but i dont think MS can hold their wad for 4 yrs w/o talk of a new system. or sony & nintendo. IMO nintendo will be the 1st to announce a new system as the wii is not capable of putting out epic games like gears, mgs4 etc.

on another topic on the wii, does anybody else think the success of the wii caught nintendo by surprise? what i mean is the system has certain limitations (no hdd, graphical, console shortages etc). had they anticipated the boom in sales i imagine they would've made the wii a true 'next-gen' system instead of a gamecube w/wands. right??:confused:

It's downright baffling.

Bass182
09-07-2008, 08:54 PM
What a stupid thread. Sorry, but graphics are absolutely the least important part of a game.

chillzatl
09-07-2008, 09:13 PM
no and the article in question simple says that with their engine, they are getting close. He goes on to say it still has several years of milking power out of it, but they, being Epic, feel they're getting close.

It's not hard to accept though, it's been out a few years. I hope they release the next one in two years. If it weren't for ps3 being so hard to pull top performance out of, it would be at the same point in only its second year.

FloodOne
09-07-2008, 11:21 PM
by your rhetoric tho, the ps3 would crush the 360 in the visual dept. i just dont believe that to be the case

and Bass182, your right to a certain extent, but do you honestly think that as consoles become closer to PCs that devs ARENT going to pour heavy resources into graphics? im pretty sure the ultimate goal in games is to create interactive worlds that evoke attachment to the property. its much easier for me to connect to the characters/plot of FFX as opposed to FF4

ultimatespidey81
09-08-2008, 10:43 AM
What a stupid thread. Sorry, but graphics are absolutely the least important part of a game.

i dont think you're way off line with this comment, graphics aren't the most important thing in a game I'll agree with ya there, but they do matter. if they didn't we would all still be playing on our SNES :p. or genesis for the sega fans out there lol

good comments by flood btw...

illgreen
09-08-2008, 11:01 AM
http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=31354