View Full Version : Ratio of master tracks to covers? Paranoid a cover?
Magnet
06-27-2007, 05:38 AM
Do you folks at HMX have a good idea of how many masters compared to covers will be in the game (as in 2:1 or 4:1 or something like that)?
I noticed that a currently stickied thread has what I believe is some incorrect info in its first post. It says that all four known tracks are the masters, but the magazine where the info came from actually says that only three are "original master tracks" (with Paranoid - the only one missing the master label - being a cover presumably?).
So it seems from the released info that the general ratio that we can expect is 3 masters for every cover. I know that extrapolating a statistic like this is completely unreliable though, so is there a more informed statistic out there that you can reveal yet?
And is anyone able (that is, allowed and willing) to confirm whether Paranoid is a cover or not?
Rev0lver
06-27-2007, 08:07 AM
well if it isn't the master track its a cover. i would love to see more MT's than covers for rock band. some songs, like killing in the name, sounded horribly wrong for GH.
SoraRikuVGM
06-27-2007, 11:58 AM
Paranoid IS a cover, GI says so.
hellninja
06-27-2007, 12:59 PM
yeah, maybe the megadeth version:eek:
Brock_Landers
06-27-2007, 06:49 PM
Didn't someone say the problem with getting masters is that many tracks before (and i'm pulling a date out of my ass here) 1987 or something just weren't recorded/archived with seperate instrument tracks?
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.7 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.