RockBand.com

Aerosmith vs. Journey

Printable View

  • 02-23-2009 02:37 PM
    WingsOfSteel
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by supernova1324 View Post
    Technically, Linkin Par and The Who are both rock, does that make them comparable?

    Yes.

    "The Who is a much better band than Linkin Park is," is a comparison, hence they are comparable. QED.
  • 02-23-2009 03:26 PM
    Rockbandfan23467
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Quinarvy View Post
    Aerosmith because nothing beats Sweet Emotion built into a ****ing Roller Coaster.

    Sweet Emotion's riff makes Jimmy Page jealous.
  • 02-23-2009 04:58 PM
    ClassicRockFanatic23
    hate em both with a passion, but I have to go with Aerosmith.
  • 02-23-2009 04:59 PM
    Idiostock
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by WingsOfSteel View Post
    Yes.

    "The Who is a much better band than Linkin Park is," is a comparison, hence they are comparable. QED.

    And comparing like that is nonsense. I'd take Linkin Park over The Who any day. Are they better? Specifics are needed. Better at their instruments? Better at producing the sound they go for?

    People seem to think that the simplicity of some bands is bad, which is bull ****. Visions or Eye of the Tiger? Anyone?
  • 02-23-2009 05:02 PM
    Idiostock
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Gowienczyk View Post
    Aerosmith always came off as a bad Rolling Stones clone to me.

    I always lol when people ***** about screamo and then praise Aerosmith.

    I could stand them if Tyler didn't ruin EVERY ****ING SONG with his incomprehensible screeching.

    Journey >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aerosmith
  • 02-23-2009 05:03 PM
    FlyGuyLXI
    easy one, Journey. They're just more melodic to me.

    wheres the poll?
  • 02-23-2009 05:08 PM
    Insane3
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Quinarvy View Post
    Aerosmith because nothing beats Sweet Emotion built into a ****ing Roller Coaster.

    what about roundabout?
  • 02-23-2009 05:10 PM
    Insane3
    I would like to politely ask what's the interest in Aerosmith? What did they do that nobody did before? It's a true question, not rhetorical.
  • 02-23-2009 06:12 PM
    ArmsAreLoud
    They didn't really; they just did it "best". Led Zeppelin was not even close to innovating the genre in any way, either.

    I happen to adore both bands, but I prefer Aerosmith.
  • 02-23-2009 07:55 PM
    Insane3
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by ArmsAreLoud View Post
    They didn't really; they just did it "best". Led Zeppelin was not even close to innovating the genre in any way, either.

    I happen to adore both bands, but I prefer Aerosmith.

    I don't agree about Led Zeppelin. I don't like LZ, I actually irationally hate them, but they did things in a way nobody did before, like Kashmir. But in a sense, I have to agree, what they did best was not the create genres but to try to make them better.