lol


My position is that if they can sell it for more, it will be more. That's all my position has ever been, broski.

Your issue is you intend for the extra cash to go to the band. What you fail to understand is, it very very likely won't.

Thank you for supporting my position.



Thank you for showing why my first post, stating that this thread was pointless because most people will still buy, was correct.

Is that clear for everyone now? Because this is what I and bmaninc have been saying for quite a while.

People buy just the same at the $3 mark as at the $2 mark and the $3 mark will become...

I only "insulted" his intelligence after he perceived what I said as an insult. I figured if I'm going to be accused of a crime I'm going to be guilty of it.




If you pay $45,000 for a car...

I merely stated, from the getgo, that this thread is pointless and I gave a very good reasoning of why.
Then I showed him why buying a song at $3 isn't the best thing to do financially.

Don't...

Who ****ing claimed that? Seriously. Why don't you try to not put words in my mouth?

I said that if labels see songs at $3 selling just as well as songs at lower prices.. what are they gonna do?...

You can rationalize ignoring it all you want, I don't really care.



No, but I was accused of something so therefore I was backing up my position.
Any group that doesn't mind suing a 6 year...

"The RIAA represents over 1,600 member labels, which are private corporate entities such as record labels and distributors, and which collectively create and distribute about 90% of recorded music...

How do you figure? I'm showing how the labels act and therefore how they will likely act.




I'm going to knock anyone that's going to encourage something negative that will affect me.


...

And if you don't like indie then nuts to ya, amrite?

So when you talk about this "smart label"... are you talking about the labels that sued 6 year olds for downloading a couple songs illegally?

If the labels are anything, it's greedy to no end....

What I'm trying to tell you is, if songs move at $3, you may end up paying $3 for all.

K?

I could only imagine the comments if Guitar Hero released Lady Gaga.

Let the hypocrisy continue. Today. Tomorrow. Forever.

Zoom-zoom

I'm telling you right now, if you're willing to spend $3 on a song.. you're not very smart financially.

No, the point is that there are some reasonable people out there that understand A) $3 for a song is not reasonable and B) if songs sell well at $3 you will soon find most, if not all, songs at $3...

And that's why this thread is pointless, because people will buy.

Not sure what's hard to understand here.

And that's why they will continue to price songs at $3.

And as long as you're willing to spend $3 on a song, you have no right to complain.

If Rock Band "failed" there's two reasons for it:

1) People in this country are so obsessed with brand names that they will A) Buy the product because of the name and therefore B) Not even try the...

Okay? And what I'm saying is that people complaining about the price and then admitting they would spend that price on music they like is completely countering their complaint.

Don't ***** about...