RockBand.com

Forums
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 45
  1. #11
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    805
    I doubt how effective people think exporting is.

    The majority of the people in the world have no issue simply switching the disc. The only games that make sense to export are RB1 and RB2 since it's going to use the same DLC and very different engines.
    This needs a good ol' Rick Flair - WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
    X360:Ledgo

  2. #12
    Metal Maiden
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    RIGHT BEHIND YOU!
    Posts
    3,490
    I haven't bought the Beatles solely because it isn't exportable.

    Seems to a great game, but I'd like the songs to have the longevity of my other songs on the platform.

    PS: I am probably in the minority.
    http://www.last.fm/user/Lady_Siara
    Join the IRC: http://www.rockband.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10566

  3. #13
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    925
    I'd like exporting for a couple reasons...

    Sure it's probably lazy, but I don't like changing discs. I like to play several different songs at the same time. As far as the dreamscapes go, yes, they were beautiful, but they distracted me from the actual game. For the most part, I didn't even watch them because I was too busy concentrating on the notes flying my way. Would it bother me seeing The Master of Gravity playing a Beatles song? Not in the slightest, because for the most part, I wouldn't even be watching that part of the screen.

    There's also the updates to Pro Mode. If they exported it to Rock Band 3 and added the Pro Mode aspects to The Beatle songs, I could learn to play Beatles songs on the guitar. I'd love that. Wouldn't you? And since they've done all the Pro Drums already, we'd have those as well. However, in order to use them, they'd have to on Rock Band 3, unless they patched the game. However, patching the game doesn't net them any cash.

    Also, for the 1.8 million people who bought Beatles Rock Band, let's say only half of them buy the export for $5. That's $4.5 million. That's a nice chunk of change there. And that's only half. I'm willing to bet that even though most "don't care" about exportation, a lot more than half would take advantage of it. And that's not even counting the numbers who would then go out and buy the game solely for export.
    91 out of 511 songs on my 2009 Wishlist are down! tinyurl.com/2009DLC

    46 out of 487 songs on my 2010 Wishlist are down! tinyurl.com/2010DLC

  4. #14
    Opening Act
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    ...On The Hill
    Posts
    332
    Quote Originally Posted by Droosies View Post
    I'd like exporting for a couple reasons...
    I am in the group of non-exporters, but I have to say, those are the best arguments I have read. I think they can patch it, and still charge $5 a patch. But I do not know that for a fact. Yes, Pro-mode would be cool.

  5. #15
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    925
    Quote Originally Posted by Dozer3677 View Post
    I am in the group of non-exporters, but I have to say, those are the best arguments I have read. I think they can patch it, and still charge $5 a patch. But I do not know that for a fact. Yes, Pro-mode would be cool.
    The catch is they can't charge for patches. That would be free as it would be required to play the game. Also, it'd screw over the Wii players again, and I'm sure HMX has heard enough on that subject. I think the only way to get Pro Mode on all instruments would in fact be to have the game export up to the main platform. And again, if they can make it Pro-compatible, I'm sure that'd convert a lot of you "non-exporters" to plop down the $5 fee and also be enough to sit through looking at the RB avatars playing Beatles songs.
    91 out of 511 songs on my 2009 Wishlist are down! tinyurl.com/2009DLC

    46 out of 487 songs on my 2010 Wishlist are down! tinyurl.com/2010DLC

  6. #16
    Besse's Girl
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Auburn, AL
    Posts
    21,544
    I can't quite possibly imagine a scenario where people would be so against the option of exporting the songs into one large library, but, well, here it is
    Youtube.com/HeyRiley
    I'm sorry, is that okay? You sure? Ha, alright. Okay. Sorry though

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Droosies View Post
    Also, for the 1.8 million people who bought Beatles Rock Band, let's say only half of them buy the export for $5. That's $4.5 million. That's a nice chunk of change there. And that's only half. I'm willing to bet that even though most "don't care" about exportation, a lot more than half would take advantage of it. And that's not even counting the numbers who would then go out and buy the game solely for export.
    You're assuming that the amount of people that would export is more than half, when it's probably a lot less, especially with the people here who find it nothing short of blasphemy for other avatars to perform "Back in the USSR". Considering how much ~75 Beatles recordings would cost to license, odds are they'd just end up losing a ton of money.

  8. #18
    Road Warrior
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Scranton,PA
    Posts
    2,335
    I am gonna go with the guy who said, "It's not gonna happen"
    and I bite into those buns and I just can't believe it.....they forgot the onions.

  9. #19
    Opening Act
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134
    Harmonix are not the ones that are against exporting TB:RB songs. Complaining at them won't change anything.
    F - is the Fire that rains from the Skies
    U - for Uranium Bomb!
    N - is for No Survivors...

  10. #20
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    925
    Quote Originally Posted by SirDavidTLynch View Post
    You're assuming that the amount of people that would export is more than half, when it's probably a lot less, especially with the people here who find it nothing short of blasphemy for other avatars to perform "Back in the USSR". Considering how much ~75 Beatles recordings would cost to license, odds are they'd just end up losing a ton of money.
    If you seriously think that less than half the people who own TB:RB would not export the songs to the main library if given the chance, you're smoking something.
    91 out of 511 songs on my 2009 Wishlist are down! tinyurl.com/2009DLC

    46 out of 487 songs on my 2010 Wishlist are down! tinyurl.com/2010DLC


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts