What Are You Doing RIGHT NOW? 5? - The HMX Empire Strikes Back

[schmeankman]

Originally Posted by Mikey803

less...


...but more like Tallahassee

Tallahassee is good. Then again, Nashville is better.

[Mikey803]

Originally Posted by schmeankman

Tallahassee is good. Then again, Nashville is better.

...wasn't refering to the place!

[Der_Lex]

Originally Posted by Mikey803

3.5!

^D&D, dude!

3.5 is a good improvement over 3.0, and still the best system for combat-light campaigns.

We currently still have one 3.5 campaign running, a roleplay-heavy campaign in which most sessions go by without a single combat or even a dice roll. It's also interesting because it's a campaign in which we all play evil characters, which means that you can't even trust your fellow players in any given situation. My own character is an upstanding young nobleman dabbling in city politics who secretly practices the necromantic arts and works on becoming a powerful lich so he can, in the end, destroy the gods and the world itself because he considers them irrevocably flawed(even the other players don't know the last bit. Good thing too, since they'd try and kill me if they did ).

[schmeankman]

Neither was I.

On an unrelated note, Dennis Quade and Dan Quayle should form one person, as their names are too similar to be seperate people. Same with Cher and Madonna.

[Mikey803]

Originally Posted by Der_Lex

3.5 is a good improvement over 3.0, and still the best system for combat-light campaigns.

We currently still have one 3.5 campaign running, a roleplay-heavy campaign in which most sessions go by without a single combat or even a dice roll. It's also interesting because it's a campaign in which we all play evil characters, which means that you can't even trust your fellow players in any given situation. My own character is an upstanding young nobleman dabbling in city politics who secretly practices the necromantic arts and works on becoming a powerful lich so he can, in the end, destroy the gods and the world itself because he considers them irrevocably flawed(even the other players don't know the last bit. Good thing too, since they'd try and kill me if they did ).

You'd never kill St. Cuthbert...

...I wouldn't allow it!

[Mikey803]

Originally Posted by schmeankman

Neither was I.

On an unrelated note, Dennis Quade and Dan Quayle should form one person, as their names are too similar to be seperate people. Same with Cher and Madonna.

all I'm going to say about that...

Dick York. Dick Sergeant.
Sergeant York...that's weird!

[Der_Lex]

Originally Posted by Mikey803

You'd never kill St. Cuthbert...

...I wouldn't allow it!

The ridiculously detailed setting that we play that campaign in (the result of two DMs with way too much time on their hands) has a different pantheon, so no worries there.

Having multiple DMs in a session works surprisingly well. It's also pretty much necessary, since we're not really an adventuring party in the traditional sense and each player is usually off doing their own thing. There's one PC in our group that my character hasn't even met yet, and we're all level 7.

[schmeankman]

@MiketheBike803: Did somebody say

LAUGH OUT LOUD?

[Mikey803]

Originally Posted by Der_Lex

The ridiculously detailed setting that we play that campaign in (the result of two DMs with way too much time on their hands) has a different pantheon, so no worries there.

Having multiple DMs in a session works surprisingly well. It's also pretty much necessary, since we're not really an adventuring party in the traditional sense and each player is usually off doing their own thing. There's one PC in our group that my character hasn't even met yet, and we're all level 7.

Damn man...two DM's?

Sound's interesting...


And how have you not met a member of your own party yet???

[Mikey803]

Originally Posted by schmeankman

@MiketheBike803: Did somebody say

LAUGH OUT LOUD?

I know I did!