RockBand.com

Forums
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 21 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 206
  1. #21
    Pooper of Parties
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Taylor, Detroit Metro, MI
    Posts
    17,082
    Quote Originally Posted by a21schizoidman View Post
    ill give them a listen

    and yeah, i made up my own little way of defining prog rock bands sounds/eras
    I think I set it up as:

    60s - Pioneering Era
    70s - Traditional Era
    80s - Regression Era
    90s - Revisionist Era
    00s - Urban Era

    Revisionist History/Categorization is fun!
    Official Sonic the Hedgehog Fanatic
    Film/Music Snob Extraordinaire

    @PharmacyRage
    last.fm/user/Gowienczyk
    http://rateyourmusic.com/~Gowienczyk

  2. #22
    Prog-nosticator
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    You make an ass of yourself when you insult Picasso, modern art of all kinds, and timmay. - Tyler
    Posts
    22,000
    Quote Originally Posted by Gowienczyk View Post
    I think I set it up as:

    60s - Pioneering Era
    70s - Traditional Era
    80s - Regression Era
    90s - Revisionist Era
    00s - Urban Era

    Revisionist History/Categorization is fun!
    i generally go by
    66-71/72 - first wave (pioneering, still strong jazz/fusion influence, start of the genre)
    73-79 - second wave (perfection of the sound, the high water mark of the genre)
    80-89 - third wave (80s sound mixed with prog, neo-prog in its heyday, loss in interest due to punk)
    90-now - fourth wave (bringing back the genre, back to late first wave/early second wave type prog)

  3. #23
    Pooper of Parties
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Taylor, Detroit Metro, MI
    Posts
    17,082
    Quote Originally Posted by a21schizoidman View Post
    i generally go by
    66-71/72 - first wave (pioneering, still strong jazz/fusion influence, start of the genre)
    73-79 - second wave (perfection of the sound, the high water mark of the genre)
    80-89 - third wave (80s sound mixed with prog, neo-prog in its heyday, loss in interest due to punk)
    90-now - fourth wave (bringing back the genre, back to late first wave/early second wave type prog)
    What? There isn't a whole lot of dominance of revival bands of the 70s sound. Theres more modern hard rock/prog fusion types that I've seen. Ranging from Dredg, Joey Epaprd's 3, etc.

    But I guess it depends on what community you know.
    Official Sonic the Hedgehog Fanatic
    Film/Music Snob Extraordinaire

    @PharmacyRage
    last.fm/user/Gowienczyk
    http://rateyourmusic.com/~Gowienczyk

  4. #24
    Prog-nosticator
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    You make an ass of yourself when you insult Picasso, modern art of all kinds, and timmay. - Tyler
    Posts
    22,000
    Quote Originally Posted by Gowienczyk View Post
    What? There isn't a whole lot of dominance of revival bands of the 70s sound. Theres more modern hard rock/prog fusion types that I've seen. Ranging from Dredg, Joey Epaprd's 3, etc.

    But I guess it depends on what community you know.
    its not necessarily just revival of the sound, its incorporating the sound into more modern music, not saying that they all are trying to be soft machine of the 00s, but they will make a harder, more upbeat and modern jazz/prog kind of music


    also, note: this is only for progressive rock, not any form of prog metal

  5. #25
    Pooper of Parties
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Taylor, Detroit Metro, MI
    Posts
    17,082
    Quote Originally Posted by a21schizoidman View Post
    its not necessarily just revival of the sound, its incorporating the sound into more modern music, not saying that they all are trying to be soft machine of the 00s, but they will make a harder, more upbeat and modern jazz/prog kind of music


    also, note: this is only for progressive rock, not any form of prog metal
    Prog Metal that's all wankery sucks anyway. Unless you are Zakk. I like the artistic more creative prog metal groups like Mechanical Poet, Diablo Swing Orchestra, Pain of Salvation, Orphaned Land, Symphony X, Amaseffer, To-Mera, etc.
    Last edited by Gowienczyk; 01-21-2009 at 10:10 PM.
    Official Sonic the Hedgehog Fanatic
    Film/Music Snob Extraordinaire

    @PharmacyRage
    last.fm/user/Gowienczyk
    http://rateyourmusic.com/~Gowienczyk

  6. #26
    Road Warrior
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NYMFC
    Posts
    4,623
    Quote Originally Posted by a21schizoidman View Post
    ill give them a listen

    and yeah, i made up my own little way of defining prog rock bands sounds/eras
    I *LIKE* it. I usually lump the first two generations together, but I suppose it's not fair to compare Rush to Yes. Based on your categorization, would you say the first generation was artsy, the second generation were arena rockers, third gen more pop, and fourth either more psychedelic (for lack of a better term) or closer to metal?.
    Does anyone chart anymore? le sigh.

  7. #27
    Prog-nosticator
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    You make an ass of yourself when you insult Picasso, modern art of all kinds, and timmay. - Tyler
    Posts
    22,000
    Quote Originally Posted by Soror_YZBL View Post
    I *LIKE* it. I usually lump the first two generations together, but I suppose it's not fair to compare Rush to Yes. Based on your categorization, would you say the first generation was artsy, the second generation were arena rockers, third gen more pop, and fourth either more psychedelic (for lack of a better term) or closer to metal?.
    id say the first gen was proto-prog/early prog bands while the genre was being developed (Zappa, Soft Machine, Yes, King Crimson), and the second gen is where the high water mark of genre was at (Camel, Jethro Tull, ELP), and the 3rd would be mostly 80s prog/neo prog with more pop in it (Alan Parsons Project, Marillion, IQ), then the 4th is rebirth of the genre by taking the original sounds and putting modern twists on it to make it their own

    its kinda loose, but it helps seperate the genre enough to be able to channel people in the right direction, like you said, you can't compare bands of the Canterbury Scene to say, neo-prog, its just not the same

  8. #28
    I believe that Geddy Lee's voice single handedly puts Rush in 1st Place.

  9. #29
    Prog-nosticator
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    You make an ass of yourself when you insult Picasso, modern art of all kinds, and timmay. - Tyler
    Posts
    22,000
    Quote Originally Posted by Zofo15 View Post
    I believe that Geddy Lee's voice single handedly puts Rush in 1st Place.
    http://www.rockband.com/forums/showthread.php?t=116832

  10. #30
    Washed Up
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Amn
    Posts
    13,747
    Nice list the weirdest part is that I have heard all of those groups
    Also, very good balance between modern and classic Prog.
    "A culture's teachings, and most importantly, the nature of its people, achieve definition in conflict."


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts