Dissapointed in LRB?

[ghostofjarjar]

I give it a solid 6. The new features are nice but the missing old features really hinder it. I mean, at least have LOCAL Leaderboards. Loading times are insane and Legos just look weird with "teeth" lol

[MattyT]

I'll take quality over quantity any day, and being that this isn't Rock Band 3, (it's more like Rock Band 2.5), I have no issue with there not being 80+ songs.

[Ramirez16]

I like the setlist, venues, characters and vocal engine (I can actually do good on Hard just like TBRB). But the filter and load times make it less enjoyable.

[jeccaneko]

No, I'm not disappointed. I'm enjoying it way more than I thought I would, and in fact, there's some features in it that I think should be in RB3. I mentioned it in another post, but some good examples are making an album (though in RB3 they should let you make your own artwork and also make longer setlists), the stat tracking in the office, the fact it switches between stars and scores on the song selection screen, and so on.

The lack of online play or leaderboards and the weird DLC filter is a downer, but that's why RB2 is still my main RB game.

[monkeyfish]

My friend has this on the Wii, so he'd give it a negative-googolplex. I personally give it an eight, as it exports to my library and it's a funny little flawed game on the side.

[Webhead64]

Question; How do you change the name of a thread?

[Ehfahq]

Question; How do you change the name of a thread?

Edit the first post, then go to advanced mode and you can change the title.

[thjimmy]

I gave this game a 10. I expected it to be a trackpack, but it turned out to be a really fun game. It also incorporates a lot of features that make casual players more interested in Rock Band:
Auto-Bass
Unlimited saves
Save yourself
Super-Easy difficulty

Big "thumbs-up" for LEGO!

[Webhead64]

Edit the first post, then go to advanced mode and you can change the title.

Thanks!

[Webhead64]

Uh oh, it only changed the post one, not the whole thread; Feedback?