Just to be contrarian: Surprise us.![]()
Just to be contrarian: Surprise us.![]()
Official forum economist. Explodes when thrown.
PSN: madmikefisk
I think we at the HoR have no problem with such a picture.
Also, I'd be for a weekly thing, easier to keep up with than daily.
Despite all my rage, I'm still just Nicolas Cage
I'll probably start a daily thing back up next week.
I started a list a few days ago of stuff I accidentally skipped over as well as a couple gems I've discovered since ending the list earlier this year.
Genres will probably be a bit less evenly distributed since there's a much smaller sample size, but there's still lots of variety.
http://rateyourmusic.com/~afterstasis
http://www.last.fm/user/wasteful
I think I blurt out for everyone else, when I say we can't wait.
Add a drop of lavender to your milk, leave town with an orange, and pretend you're laughing at it.
One more query for the folks who utilize this thread...
From the start I have avoided releases from 2009 onward in hopes that you guys have dug through my top albums lists from those years already.
Should I drop this rule altogether (creating a surplus of 2009-2010 LP's for the list), or maybe just do short-form lists (like the huge list-dumps I dropped earlier this year) for 2009 and 2010 albums that make the grade for this list?
http://rateyourmusic.com/~afterstasis
http://www.last.fm/user/wasteful
I say drop the rule, the more albums the better, you can decide how you wanna drop them either way works as long as it's more exposure
Le Desordre, C'est Moi
Resident Emo Purist/Elitist
Just drop the occasional 2009-2010 album in as a bonus.
Official forum economist. Explodes when thrown.
PSN: madmikefisk