Then they'd have to keep track of the first 100,000 scores for every combination.
What do you mean how?How?
It doesn't 'imply' anything. For the...third? time, EVERYTHING you're suggesting about the leaderboards is just mirroring what they already do. There's no 'implications' going on, it's being accurate and blunt.It's actually less ego-stroking. The current notation implies "you're in the top!"


Reply With Quote










