Alien Ant Farm and the RBN!

[BathTub]

I've seen one that was even worse. I can't remember the name of it, but it had off-key tubes that had slides up and down entire octaves for no reason. It must have gone through only one draft and absolutely no testing.

EDIT: Low Life in the Fast Lane.

A similar video for Movies would be interesting.

[DeadPlayer]

I agree with Zero and Dog, that defintly wasn't ready to be released. For the sake of fans everywhere please pull it and rechart it.

[Lowlander2]

Yes, give me a refund, I want my 1 MSP back.

[Catch-22]

Yes, give me a refund, I want my 1 MSP back.

You bought the 1 msp version of it?

Can you confirm whether the vocal issues are present on it as well. Do you have a way to make a youtube video of it?

[DragoonXD]

You bought the 1 msp version of it?

Can you confirm whether the vocal issues are present on it as well. Do you have a way to make a youtube video of it?

I cannot make a video (as I don't have my Xbox at my dorm), but I can confirm the vocals are the same in the 1 point version.

[Catch-22]

Thank you, this will help us over at creators.

[Chemical Phoenix]

So is Movies being pulled? It's a shame if who ever charted it plans to leave it like this.

I was really looking forward to it :\

[bwestplaysdrums]

It seems pretty obvious that nobody, in the company or RBN play testers, actually tried to sing this. Please pull this and get your act together.

Just wanted to point out that I failed this song in the first version of Peer Review with the following comments: "Vocals: Need a ton of work still. All of the tubes in the entire first verse are about an 8th note late, and the tail end of many tubes throughout the entire song are way too long and catching consonant sounds - "motion", "seem", "wrong", "taste" "rain", and that's just in the first verse." Point is, the vocal issues were pointed out, but beyond that point it's the author's responsibility to fix them.

I failed the track another 3 or 4 times over the next few months for drum issues afterwards, but I went on tour for two weeks in August and the song inexplicably passed in the meantime.

[Catch-22]

Just wanted to point out that I failed this song in the first version of Peer Review with the following comments: "Vocals: Need a ton of work still. All of the tubes in the entire first verse are about an 8th note late, and the tail end of many tubes throughout the entire song are way too long and catching consonant sounds - "motion", "seem", "wrong", "taste" "rain", and that's just in the first verse." Point is, the vocal issues were pointed out, but beyond that point it's the author's responsibility to fix them.

I failed the track another 3 or 4 times over the next few months for drum issues afterwards, but I went on tour for two weeks in August and the song inexplicably passed in the meantime.

Perhaps a public forum might not be the best place to post that and would be better done in at creators.

[non_zero]

I was referring specifically to the play testers in the latest PR version. If you pointed stuff out previously you're one of the good guys.