RockBand.com

Forums
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 70
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by sillystou View Post
    makes me wonder if the bieber has a beaver.
    lmao.
    Wishlist:
    The Cure [1]
    Queen [28?]
    AFI [7]
    My Chem. [3]

  2. #22
    Headliner
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Near Los Angeles
    Posts
    5,003
    Quote Originally Posted by Dangimarocker View Post
    Disagree, he's 100% right.
    You'd rather buy A Justin Bieber discology over Zeppelin or Queen?
    No, but internet music purchasing has become so embedded in the world that people, even young children, especially young children, can buy music online and listen to it. So the numbers for more popular/recent artists (especially those targeted towards children, i.e. Katy Perry and Bieber) are going to skyrocket, and older artists, no matter how much "better" they are, will fall by the wayside.

    Newer artists will always sell more than older artists; it's true in every example he gives, and it's reasonable. I don't like it either, but I am satisfied knowing that the older music he lists will maintain better than most, if not all, of the newer artists he mentioned.
    AsianSteev: if you can read this, put more Ska songs on the RBN! Please?

    Gamertag: Demitri Theodus

  3. #23
    Washed Up
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    14,835
    Not to mention he doesn't say if it's adjusted for inflation. If The Beatles made $1,000 playing a show or something and Katy Perry made $10,000....The Beatles made more money.

  4. #24
    The Archies had four top 40 hits. The Jimi Hendrix Experience had one.

  5. #25
    Washed Up
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    14,835
    Yeah, 1969 was a weird year for the charts. '69 had some great classic rock songs that have undoubtedly stood the test of time, yet the year-end #1 was this.

    *shudder*

  6. #26
    UnWashed
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    18,022
    Quote Originally Posted by SheSaidSheSaid View Post
    Yeah, 1969 was a weird year for the charts. '69 had some great classic rock songs that have undoubtedly stood the test of time, yet the year-end #1 was this.

    *shudder*
    classic
    yogurtwithsprinkles.bandcamp.com

    Quote Originally Posted by hmxhenry View Post
    When Dragoninforcer is making the most reasonable and mature posts, you KNOW a thread is in trouble.

  7. #27
    Washed Up
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    14,835
    Bit of trivia: It's former President George W. Bush's favorite song.

  8. #28
    Headliner
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    6,190
    I love that song.

  9. #29
    Headl!ner
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    An aviary far from home, NY
    Posts
    10,240
    Just because something is charting massively doesn't mean it's going to be remembered.

    The Jonas Brothers were practically non-existent already. Plus as mentioned earlier, who the hell remembers The Archies?
    _ Genesis
    _ Kamelot
    _ Pure Reason Revolution
    _ VNV Nation
    _ More Tribe

    "And onward now, and on forever, all great things to come"

  10. #30
    Headliner
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Near Los Angeles
    Posts
    5,003
    George W. Bush once wanted to play Springsteen's "Born in the USA" at one of his speeches. Apparently, one of his aids suggested he read the lyrics first and realize what the song was actually about.
    AsianSteev: if you can read this, put more Ska songs on the RBN! Please?

    Gamertag: Demitri Theodus


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts