Coin Economy Tweaks

[thatmarkguy]

Blasteroids, are you arguing against yourself now?

Yes, Facebook usage has an extremely high rate of penetration among young western technology-savvy people. And guess what demographic is most likely to have installed a downloadable internet-integrated music videogame on a modern home console?

There will be a high correlation between Blitz owners and Facebook users. It will not match the Facebook-users-to-global-citizens ratio.

[Blasteroids]

Because we are concerned with the online social interaction not the social interaction of the word as a whole. Also in the grand scheme of things 3.5% is a huge number. Also that fun fact is wrong. Even if a question like that is asked someone will answer wrong.

LOL, you just don't get it.

Did you know that children with bigger feet are better at maths? Which must surely mean that children keep their brains in there feet right?

[www1221]

LOL, you just don't get it.

Did you know that children with bigger feet are better at maths? Which must surely mean that children keep their brains in there feet right?

The whole discussion started when ninjasweetheart said that and I quote, "does anybody really go out of their way to use it rather than abuse it as a quick distraction?" so why would you bring up the people that dont even use the internet? You wouldnt.

[Blasteroids]

The whole discussion started when ninjasweetheart said that and I quote, "does anybody really go out of their way to use it rather than abuse it as a quick distraction?" so why would you bring up the people that dont even use the internet? You wouldnt.

If you are going to quote a paragraph, then atleast quote it from the start...

Okay. Since when was Facebook the epitome of social interaction? It's popular (for the while) but does anybody really go out of their way to use it rather than abuse it as a quick distraction?

www1221: See that 1st sentence? That is the start of the discussion.

Yes, Facebook usage has an extremely high rate of penetration among young western technology-savvy people. And guess what demographic is most likely to have installed a downloadable internet-integrated music videogame on a modern home console?

Even if you do have to marginalise it not only to a certain demographic and also a particular age groupd... you get the basis of the discussion. Which is why I find www1221 quite funny.

[www1221]

If you are going to quote a paragraph, then atleast quote it from the start...

www1221: See that 1st sentence? That is the start of the discussion.

That wasnt the part that I commented on and that wasnt the part that you called out.

[GNFfhqwhgads]

If you're asking why Facebook is the epitome of social interaction, you're supposed to compare it to other social networking sites, not the population of the world. And YES, people interact with their mouths too, no one cares, because word of mouth is not a tool to distribute game functions with. Of all the things to whine about for no apparent reason, this is pretty high up there.

"I don't have a Facebook."

"So make a fake one if you want the awards."

"But why do I HAVE to? Since when is Facebook that popular?"


Since counting started being a thing. That's when. If you don't want one, don't make one, but don't sit and ***** that you're missing out or that Facebook suddenly isn't a big thing to go through.

[Blasteroids]

That wasnt the part that I commented on and that wasnt the part that you called out.

Nope, I replied to HMXMister_Game and not you. You replied to me and took the conversation into a different direction, which you then tried to backup by trying to marginalise the dataset in your favor. I then retaliated by showing you that marginalising a dataset is wrong with the original discussion to which you then said "That wasnt the part that I commented on and that wasnt the part you called out".

tl;dr : I still fail to see any rational point by you in respect to the initial conversation.

[www1221]

Nope, I replied to HMXMister_Game and not you. You replied to me and took the conversation into a different direction, which you then tried to backup by trying to marginalise the dataset in your favor. I then retaliated by showing you that marginalising a dataset is wrong with the original discussion to which you then said "That wasnt the part that I commented on and that wasnt the part you called out".

tl;dr : I still fail to see any rational point by you in respect to the initial conversation.

See GNF's post.

your tl;dr doesnt make any sense

[SirDavidTLynch]

Using all 7 billion people in the world as a point of reference is dumb because by that logic nobody ever does anything except maybe breathe. But how can everybody breathe when there's barely any oxygen in the universe?

[Blasteroids]

If you're asking why Facebook is the epitome of social interaction, you're supposed to compare it to other social networking sites, not the population of the world.

Yawn... Correlation does not imply causation.

Since counting started being a thing. That's when.

So now your telling me that Facebook became important at the same time as counting. Well, if you are 8 or 9, that could be true I guess?