RockBand.com

Forums
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 14 of 14
  1. #11
    Pedantic Broken Record
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,949
    Quote Originally Posted by peterock2007 View Post
    Absolutely correct, but for every game there reaches a good enough point. Where the need to improve non gameplay effects is outweighed by the cost. RB3 more than reaches that point of equity.
    RB3's instrument (not vocals) engines are pretty much good enough and can do with just minor tweaks, leaving more developer time for the little things.

    It appears that your "good enough" for aesthetics is quite a bit lower than mine, and that's okay.

    By the way, if you're really that un-interested in the characters, why did you click on a thread about them? If it's really just to mess with me, that I can understand, because it seems to be your thing.


    Quote Originally Posted by peterock2007 View Post
    Take any one your point of your complaints, compare the plus/minus of changing that with cost of changing it and see how many are still relevant.
    Actually, lots of my complaints tend to have quick fixes. That's why I complain.

    I stopped complaining about the lack of a tour because that would be too much work for too little benefit. A venue select would do what I want just fine.

    The animations/characters are the one area that I complain about where the quick fix (blacking out the background) would be less than satisfactory.

    Quote Originally Posted by peterock2007 View Post
    I’m surprised that you aren’t one of those people that need to dress in costume irl in order to enjoy playing this game. Or are you?
    I'm just too lazy and cheap.
    Last edited by TheHundredDollarHeadache; 11-29-2012 at 01:53 PM.
    We've ended on a sour note:
    http://www.facebook.com/RB3isFlawed

    Still...thank you for the music

  2. #12
    Road Warrior
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,432
    Quote Originally Posted by TheHundredDollarHeadache View Post
    RB3's instrument (not vocals) engines are pretty much good enough and can do with just minor tweaks, leaving more developer time for the little things.

    It appears that your "good enough" for aesthetics is quite a bit lower than mine, and that's okay.
    I really meant for the majority of rb3 gamers, not my own personal opinion. The Recordettes aren't a huge population are they? I don't ever remember your threads having too many harmony parts.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheHundredDollarHeadache View Post
    By the way, if you're really that un-interested in the characters, why did you click on a thread about them? If it's really just to mess with me, that I can understand, because it seems to be your thing.
    I totally wouldn't do that... Right?



    Quote Originally Posted by TheHundredDollarHeadache View Post
    Actually, lots of my complaints tend to have quick fixes. That's why I complain.
    Your fixes might be "quick" but that's unrealistic to say unless you've been inside the code looking at all their modules. $50,000 isn't cheap not to mention the man hours you pay the developers to implement and test your quick fixes.

  3. #13
    Pedantic Broken Record
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,949
    Quote Originally Posted by peterock2007 View Post
    I really meant for the majority of rb3 gamers, not my own personal opinion. The Recordettes aren't a huge population are they? I don't ever remember your threads having too many harmony parts.
    Even if RB3 looks good enough, I think many players would prefer RB2's stage show over RB3's.

    ...I see what you did there with that last line.

    Quote Originally Posted by peterock2007 View Post
    I totally wouldn't do that... Right?
    I remember you popping up in the last animation thread (which was also started by a non-Recordette).

    I'm a train wreck and you can't help but look.

    Quote Originally Posted by peterock2007 View Post
    Your fixes might be "quick" but that's unrealistic to say unless you've been inside the code looking at all their modules. $50,000 isn't cheap not to mention the man hours you pay the developers to implement and test your quick fixes.
    I gave up hope for a patch a long time ago, and have held out for RB4, with the new console generation being my hope.
    We've ended on a sour note:
    http://www.facebook.com/RB3isFlawed

    Still...thank you for the music

  4. #14
    Road Warrior
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,432
    Quote Originally Posted by TheHundredDollarHeadache View Post
    Even if RB3 looks good enough, I think many players would prefer RB2's stage show over RB3's.
    I'm not arguing that but it's not like HMX had unlimited budget and could do anything they wanted. Especially since they parted ways almost so soon after release. I can't help but to imagine they were under alot of pressure to get out.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheHundredDollarHeadache View Post
    ...I see what you did there with that last line.
    Not to laugh too loudly at my own joke, I thoughly enjoyed that.


    Quote Originally Posted by TheHundredDollarHeadache View Post
    I remember you popping up in the last animation thread (which was also started by a non-Recordette).

    I'm a train wreck and you can't help but look.
    I've said before that I do get amusement from disagreeing with you.


    Quote Originally Posted by TheHundredDollarHeadache View Post
    I gave up hope for a patch a long time ago, and have held out for RB4, with the new console generation being my hope.
    My biggest frutration with you is when RB3 first came out and the first animation thread came up. I told you and a couple others that you might as well get used to it, because with HMX being independent you're never going to see a patch for most of these complaints, and if there ever is a RB4 its forever away. Multiple years of complaining is too much.


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts