because, seriously. nice cash and grab, guys. I spent 65 bucks on a game that shouldnt even be 40 bucks. thanks?
also, most of the covers are horrible, at least try when you're taking my money. thanks.
because, seriously. nice cash and grab, guys. I spent 65 bucks on a game that shouldnt even be 40 bucks. thanks?
also, most of the covers are horrible, at least try when you're taking my money. thanks.
I'm unhappy with them. alot of the covers are really poorly done.
either way, I spent way too much on a 30 dollar game, cool.
Last edited by IhateShittyMetalcore; 07-31-2007 at 01:55 PM.
Definatly too expensive. But I dont own it, I play it at a friend of mines.
What I find funny about the covers though, everyone thought I Wanna Rock was a cover, but they just re-recorded it, and it sounds like hell.
i quite like it the covers aren't to bad and it has dio
little bit on the expensive side though
I enjoyed it. I didn't buy it though. Played through it at Best Buy start to finish... five starred every song first time through except for Play With Me... took 3 tries for that one.
Wrath Child, Only A Lad, and the one song with a bazillion 3 note chords were my favorite.
Even as expensive as it was, I think that it's a great game. I mean, yeah, there are songs in it that are complete crap *cough*Only A Lad, We Got the Beat*cough* but I think this game had what GH2 didn't: fun solos. In GH the songs were fun/epic, but you couldn't even do the solos without having to strum/kill the entire solo. And GH2 had some solos, but not enough to appease my want for awesome solos. And GH80's was a breath of fresh air. Here's how I see Rocks the 80's: 1/3 of the songs - crap. 1/3 of the songs - good to listen to. 1/3 of the songs - fun as hell to play.