"1979" by smashing pumpkins anyone?

[afterstasis]

i love the song, but there's very little there for anyone other than vocalists.

[DookieMan]

I love this song, and I put it in my list.

[Salford_Lad]

Good song, might not be the wildest one to play but I know it would plenty of play at my place.

[jdweber1982]

BwBW for sure would be the best imo. Such an awesome song. 1979 is the first song I learned to play guitar and drums for, so simple and repetitive.

[TimeSplitter]

i love the song, but there's very little there for anyone other than vocalists.

Seconded. _

[citric_bullets]

1979 would be cool, but definitely would need to be accompanied by a couple songs with something for someone other than the vocalist. Geek USA would be a killer way to close up a set.

[sitbooboosit]

One of the only two Smashing Pumpkins songs I like.

[americanistax1]

i was planning to get Gh:WT because of the stronger setlist( for me the rb2 setlist is too commercial, mtv's influence) but now that they announced 1979 im 1000% sure that ill get ghwt instead of rb2, as the weekly dlc has been a piece of crap lately

[afterstasis]

i was planning to get Gh:WT because of the stronger setlist( for me the rb2 setlist is too commercial, mtv's influence) but now that they announced 1979 im 1000% sure that ill get ghwt instead of rb2, as the weekly dlc has been a piece of crap lately

how on earth do you consider the RB2 setlist more "commercial" than GH:WT's?

[instantdeath999]

how on earth do you consider the RB2 setlist more "commercial" than GH:WT's?

Seconded. Rock Band is going for the less commercial songs, as evidenced by the setlist.