Slash spills the beans - Guitar Hero: Metallica, Guitar Hero: Jimi Hendrix

[sssrcr85]

"As the original guy do you feel more invested in the game?
Well, having the Aerosmith guys do it was very cool ’cause Aerosmith’s one of the bands I was heavily influenced by. And Metallica’s doing it, that’s great. Those are two ones that I think gives it some credibility. And they’re doing a Hendrix one, which is great."

For the full interview: http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdail...ed-fans-lives/

Way to milk that franchise Activision. It sucks that HMX created the GH name and now Activision is the one cashing in.

[MeleeMan]

Wow, Rock Band is a much better game.

[Zeleii]

Wow.

This is really sad that they have to milk it like this.

[LibertineStripes]

I would buy the Hendrix one.

[sssrcr85]

I wonder why they insist on releasing games focusing on one band when they can just release DLC. It's just a blatant ripoff to charge people full price for half a game like GH:A was.

[72_tomahawk_72]

What's so wrong with having a game based around a band?

I would buy Rock Band: Metallica
Rock Band: In Flames
Rock Band: Opeth
etc.

[mercuryshadow09]

I wonder why they insist on releasing games focusing on one band when they can just release DLC. It's just a blatant ripoff to charge people full price for half a game like GH:A was.

Think about how much 84 or so songs would cost you as DLC, how much does a disc cost?

[dady5000]

Think about how much 84 or so songs would cost you as DLC, how much does a disc cost?

Maybe. BUT, lack of convenience will be an issue.

[sssrcr85]

Think about how much 84 or so songs would cost you as DLC, how much does a disc cost?

GH: has only 41 songs. I doubt that any band specific games will have more than 50-60 songs.

[WhiffleBallTony]

Don't you people have something better to complain about?